[Lutecium-group] Lutecium-group Digest, Vol 95, Issue 5

[Guy de Villers Grand-Champs]

A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PastedGraphic-1.tiff
Type: image/tiff
Size: 259386 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://www.lutecium.org/pipermail/topologos/attachments/20121119/ef0fdab6/attachment.tiff>
-------------- next part --------------

On trouve sur internet un schéma un peu différent. 




Le 19 nov. 2012 à 15:12, lutecium-group-request at lutecium.org a écrit :

> Send Lutecium-group mailing list submissions to
> 	lutecium-group at lutecium.org
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	http://cerium.lutecium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lutecium-group
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	lutecium-group-request at lutecium.org
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	lutecium-group-owner at lutecium.org
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Lutecium-group digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>   1. Re: Sem 7-Fl?ches ou pas? (BdF)
>   2. Re: Sem 7-Fl?ches ou pas? (Jacques Ponzio)
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 14:08:42 -0000
> From: "BdF" <bdf at deflorence.com>
> To: "'Jacques Ponzio'" <jacques.ponzio at free.fr>,	"'Groupe de travail
> 	pour la psychanalyse lacanienne'"	<lutecium-group at lutecium.org>
> Subject: Re: [Lutecium-group] Sem 7-Fl?ches ou pas?
> Message-ID: <007e01cdc65f$61f28950$25d79bf0$@deflorence.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="iso-8859-1"
> 
> Grand merci Jacques P.
> 
> Le scan envoy? par Jacques Ponzio n'a pas de fl?ches. Se pose alors la
> question de comment lire les correspondances indiqu?es par les lignes. De
> bonnes ?laborations en perspective pour notre groupe de lecture!
> ===
> BdF
> www.deflorence.com
> === 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jacques Ponzio [mailto:jacques.ponzio at free.fr] 
> Sent: 19 November 2012 14:04
> To: bdf at deflorence.com; Groupe de travail pour la psychanalyse lacanienne
> Subject: Re: [Lutecium-group] Sem 7-Fl?ches ou pas?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 2
> Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 15:03:53 +0100
> From: Jacques Ponzio <jacques.ponzio at free.fr>
> To: bdf at deflorence.com, Groupe de travail pour la psychanalyse
> 	lacanienne	<lutecium-group at lutecium.org>
> Subject: Re: [Lutecium-group] Sem 7-Fl?ches ou pas?
> Message-ID: <8EEE2079-9799-4359-BF60-07372CA9FB24 at free.fr>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; Format="flowed"
> 
> voil? Bruno
> amiti?
> Jacques
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: Lacan.jpeg
> Type: image/jpeg
> Size: 715196 bytes
> Desc: not available
> URL: <http://cerium.lutecium.org/pipermail/lutecium-group/attachments/20121119/8ba59584/attachment.jpeg>
> -------------- next part --------------
> 
> Le 19 nov. 12 ? 14:52, BdF a ?crit :
> 
>> lutecium-group: Ceci est un document du  Groupe de Travail Lutecium.
>> ---Petit probl?me de graphe: dans ma version du s?minaire 7, 25  
>> novembre 1959,
>> il y a un graphe (Cf. pi?ce jointe), et les lignes ont des fl?ches  
>> indiquant
>> clairement les directions. La version anglaise a les lignes SANS  
>> fl?ches. Si
>> quelqu'un pouvait v?rifier dans la version Seuil, merci d'avance.
>> ===
>> BdF
>> www.deflorence.com
>> ===
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Lutecium-group mailing list
> Lutecium-group at lutecium.org
> http://cerium.lutecium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lutecium-group
> 
> 
> End of Lutecium-group Digest, Vol 95, Issue 5
> *********************************************