[The-Lacanalyst] test 123

[Tate]

Bonjour Aviva,

(I will assume that you and the group are receiving this email, while it is only myself that is not receiving a copy of the responses. I am also sending a CC duplicate to Jacques to make sure.) 

Unfortunately, I  already have a meeting this week at this time on Thursday. Also, I would propose, if you and your colleagues find it appropriate, to invite a few others
besides myself to attend, as this psychoanalysis title question in the US is recurrent. In any case, I can envisage some kind of meeting in the weeks to come to address this
question. Please let me know if this email was received, possible meeting times, and if you are open to inviting others to listen/participate.

Best regards,

Scully Robert



> On Sep 29, 2025, at 6:54 AM, Aviva Euripides <euripides.aviva at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Dear Scully-Robert,
> We are meeting this Thursday at 7 am PDT.
> Let me know if you would like the Zoom link.  
> Aviva
> 
> On Sun, Sep 28, 2025, 11:35 PM Jacques B. Siboni via The-lacanalyst <the-lacanalyst at lutecium.org> wrote:
> mail problem
> 
> 
> 
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject:        test 123
> Date:   Sun, 28 Sep 2025 17:44:53 -0700
> From:   Tate <tate at netwood.net>
> To:     Jacques Siboni <jacsib at lutecium.org>
> 
> 
> 
> Hello Jacques,
> 
> 
> I have pushed reply now twice to the emails from the Lutecium list in my 
> INBOX, and they do not seem to be getting through.
> 
> Instead, it seems they are coming back to my address and CCing me also. 
> Do I need to push something besides reply?
> 
> In any case, here are my previous two messages:
> 
> Let me know,
> 
> Scully-Robert
> 
> 
> 
> "Hello all,
> Well, I sent out a previous email and it seems it did not go through ot 
> went to the wrong mailbox. Let me know if this goes through.
> I will copy-paste what I had already sent:
> 
> 
> << Bonjour Jacques and others,
> 
> In this initial probe, I am sending out a brief post just to check 
> whether the email invitation works.
> It was a pleasure to meet again in Paris for the homage to Jean-Michel.
> The question of what is required to work under the title of 
> psychoanalyst should be gone through carefully, not mistaking, for example,
> policy with statutory law, or psychoanalysis with psychoanalytic therapy.
> 
> This much said, I am not so sure email is the right forum.
> Let me know if this goes through, how, and when you would care to 
> address this.
> 
> Truly,
> 
> Scully-Robert Groome>>
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> The-lacanalyst mailing list
> The-lacanalyst at lutecium.org
> https://lutecium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/the-lacanalyst
> -- 
> The-lacanalyst mailing list
> The-lacanalyst at lutecium.org
> https://lutecium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/the-lacanalyst