[The-Lacanalyst] test 123

[Aviva Euripides]

Bonjour Scully Robert,
Oui to all.
I will make myself available to a time that works for you.  I am inviting
others with an ok from Jacques Siboni.
Aviva



On Mon, Sep 29, 2025, 9:43 AM Tate via The-lacanalyst <
the-lacanalyst at lutecium.org> wrote:

> Bonjour Aviva,
>
> (I will assume that you and the group are receiving this email, while it
> is only myself that is not receiving a copy of the responses. I am also
> sending a CC duplicate to Jacques to make sure.)
>
> Unfortunately, I  already have a meeting this week at this time on
> Thursday. Also, I would propose, if you and your colleagues find it
> appropriate, to invite a few others
> besides myself to attend, as this psychoanalysis title question in the US
> is recurrent. In any case, I can envisage some kind of meeting in the weeks
> to come to address this
> question. Please let me know if this email was received, possible meeting
> times, and if you are open to inviting others to listen/participate.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Scully Robert
>
>
>
> > On Sep 29, 2025, at 6:54 AM, Aviva Euripides <euripides.aviva at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Dear Scully-Robert,
> > We are meeting this Thursday at 7 am PDT.
> > Let me know if you would like the Zoom link.
> > Aviva
> >
> > On Sun, Sep 28, 2025, 11:35 PM Jacques B. Siboni via The-lacanalyst <
> the-lacanalyst at lutecium.org> wrote:
> > mail problem
> >
> >
> >
> > -------- Forwarded Message --------
> > Subject:        test 123
> > Date:   Sun, 28 Sep 2025 17:44:53 -0700
> > From:   Tate <tate at netwood.net>
> > To:     Jacques Siboni <jacsib at lutecium.org>
> >
> >
> >
> > Hello Jacques,
> >
> >
> > I have pushed reply now twice to the emails from the Lutecium list in my
> > INBOX, and they do not seem to be getting through.
> >
> > Instead, it seems they are coming back to my address and CCing me also.
> > Do I need to push something besides reply?
> >
> > In any case, here are my previous two messages:
> >
> > Let me know,
> >
> > Scully-Robert
> >
> >
> >
> > "Hello all,
> > Well, I sent out a previous email and it seems it did not go through ot
> > went to the wrong mailbox. Let me know if this goes through.
> > I will copy-paste what I had already sent:
> >
> >
> > << Bonjour Jacques and others,
> >
> > In this initial probe, I am sending out a brief post just to check
> > whether the email invitation works.
> > It was a pleasure to meet again in Paris for the homage to Jean-Michel.
> > The question of what is required to work under the title of
> > psychoanalyst should be gone through carefully, not mistaking, for
> example,
> > policy with statutory law, or psychoanalysis with psychoanalytic therapy.
> >
> > This much said, I am not so sure email is the right forum.
> > Let me know if this goes through, how, and when you would care to
> > address this.
> >
> > Truly,
> >
> > Scully-Robert Groome>>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > The-lacanalyst mailing list
> > The-lacanalyst at lutecium.org
> > https://lutecium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/the-lacanalyst
> > --
> > The-lacanalyst mailing list
> > The-lacanalyst at lutecium.org
> > https://lutecium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/the-lacanalyst
>
>
> --
> The-lacanalyst mailing list
> The-lacanalyst at lutecium.org
> https://lutecium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/the-lacanalyst
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lutecium.org/pipermail/the-lacanalyst/attachments/20250929/e92bfa25/attachment.htm>