[The-Lacanalyst] The more the merrier!

[Jacques B. Siboni]

Robert your mail did reach us, I have to solve this lack of acknowledgment

We can definitely increase the size of the list as it is a major problem 
in your
country (and Germany and other countries)

all the best

Jacques

On 9/29/25 4:48 PM, Aviva Euripides wrote:
> Bonjour Scully Robert,
> Oui to all.
> I will make myself available to a time that works for you.  I am 
> inviting others with an ok from Jacques Siboni.
> Aviva
>
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2025, 9:43 AM Tate via The-lacanalyst 
> <the-lacanalyst at lutecium.org> wrote:
>
>     Bonjour Aviva,
>
>     (I will assume that you and the group are receiving this email,
>     while it is only myself that is not receiving a copy of the
>     responses. I am also sending a CC duplicate to Jacques to make sure.)
>
>     Unfortunately, I  already have a meeting this week at this time on
>     Thursday. Also, I would propose, if you and your colleagues find
>     it appropriate, to invite a few others
>     besides myself to attend, as this psychoanalysis title question in
>     the US is recurrent. In any case, I can envisage some kind of
>     meeting in the weeks to come to address this
>     question. Please let me know if this email was received, possible
>     meeting times, and if you are open to inviting others to
>     listen/participate.
>
>     Best regards,
>
>     Scully Robert
>
>
>
>     > On Sep 29, 2025, at 6:54 AM, Aviva Euripides
>     <euripides.aviva at gmail.com> wrote:
>     >
>     > Dear Scully-Robert,
>     > We are meeting this Thursday at 7 am PDT.
>     > Let me know if you would like the Zoom link.
>     > Aviva
>     >
>     > On Sun, Sep 28, 2025, 11:35 PM Jacques B. Siboni via
>     The-lacanalyst <the-lacanalyst at lutecium.org> wrote:
>     > mail problem
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     > -------- Forwarded Message --------
>     > Subject:        test 123
>     > Date:   Sun, 28 Sep 2025 17:44:53 -0700
>     > From:   Tate <tate at netwood.net>
>     > To:     Jacques Siboni <jacsib at lutecium.org>
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     > Hello Jacques,
>     >
>     >
>     > I have pushed reply now twice to the emails from the Lutecium
>     list in my
>     > INBOX, and they do not seem to be getting through.
>     >
>     > Instead, it seems they are coming back to my address and CCing
>     me also.
>     > Do I need to push something besides reply?
>     >
>     > In any case, here are my previous two messages:
>     >
>     > Let me know,
>     >
>     > Scully-Robert
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     > "Hello all,
>     > Well, I sent out a previous email and it seems it did not go
>     through ot
>     > went to the wrong mailbox. Let me know if this goes through.
>     > I will copy-paste what I had already sent:
>     >
>     >
>     > << Bonjour Jacques and others,
>     >
>     > In this initial probe, I am sending out a brief post just to check
>     > whether the email invitation works.
>     > It was a pleasure to meet again in Paris for the homage to
>     Jean-Michel.
>     > The question of what is required to work under the title of
>     > psychoanalyst should be gone through carefully, not mistaking,
>     for example,
>     > policy with statutory law, or psychoanalysis with psychoanalytic
>     therapy.
>     >
>     > This much said, I am not so sure email is the right forum.
>     > Let me know if this goes through, how, and when you would care to
>     > address this.
>     >
>     > Truly,
>     >
>     > Scully-Robert Groome>>
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     > --
>     > The-lacanalyst mailing list
>     > The-lacanalyst at lutecium.org
>     > https://lutecium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/the-lacanalyst
>     > --
>     > The-lacanalyst mailing list
>     > The-lacanalyst at lutecium.org
>     > https://lutecium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/the-lacanalyst
>
>
>     -- 
>     The-lacanalyst mailing list
>     The-lacanalyst at lutecium.org
>     https://lutecium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/the-lacanalyst
>
>