Open to analysands and analysts, we propose to read, line by line, the ”Five psychoanalysis” of Freud. We begin with the story of Dora, by placing it in the context of his time, years 1900, the time when Freud abandoned hypnosis to free association, also the time when he wrote his major work, ”The Interpretation of Dreams ”. Then we will find that the different readings of Lacan has made this text. Once this journey being, Then we read the history of the Rat Man, the Wolf Man, then that of Schreber and Little Hans. Each one, in this work to develop common, should be able to find one's place. [Group of five psychoanalysis]
Category Archives: Sigmund Freud
Jean-Michel Vappereau — La métaphore du nom-du-père comme envers du Narcissisme: involution entre les formules de la sexuations et les tours du dire au dit dans l’Étourdit
Paper produced by Vappereau in Balvanera, 29 May 2004. This work is the final installment in a larger body called “L’involution signifiante,” and deals with the signifying involution, the nom-du-père, and the formulas of sexuation of Lacan using constructive mathematics and the Borromean knot.
[Added: 2025/08/24]Illustration for ”The Interpretation of Dreams”, with Sandor Ferenczi handwritten annotation
From data collected at the Library of Congress. [Illustration for ”The Interpretation of Dreams”, with Sandor Ferenczi handwritten annotation]
Civilization and Its Discontents
From data collected at the Library of Congress. [Civilization and Its Discontents]
Warum Krieg?
From data collected at the Library of Congress. [Warum Krieg?]
The Moses of Michelangelo
From data collected at the Library of Congress. [The Moses of Michelangelo]
Die Zukunft einer Illusion
From data collected at the Library of Congress. [Die Zukunft einer Illusion]
Massenpsychologie und Ich-Analyse
From data collected at the Library of Congress. [Massenpsychologie und Ich-Analyse]
Totem and Taboo
From data collected at the Library of Congress. [Totem and Taboo]
The question of profane analysis
From data collected at the Library of Congress. [The question of profane analysis]