Second argument in the “Trois essais sur la théorie de la vérité” series. This document is the first part of the second installment of the second argument, entitled “今日のすべての愛 ( 真実を書く主要なモード),” and distinguishes between object language and commentary language, called metalanguage.

02.1_Amour_du_tout_2eme_partie_I

Second argument in the “Trois essais sur la théorie de la vérité” series. This document is part two of the second installment of the second argument, entitled “今日のすべての愛 ( 真実を書く主要なモード),” and elaborates the necessities of classical logic as a writing of Freud’s subject.

02.1_Amour_du_tout_2eme_partie_II

The definitive edition of 3 ≠ 4, which is listed on the Vappereau site as 4≠3, discours entre groupe et foule. Several versions of this paper were produced, this is the last posted version, and thus the definitive edition. In this work, Vappereau articulates the function of discourse relative to place, numbers, そして letters in order to put forward new insights into the four discourses of Lacan.

3_diff_4_(v8)_レビュー

Second argument in the “Trois essais sur la théorie de la vérité” series. This document is the third installment of the second argument, entitled “今日のすべての愛 ( 真実を書く主要なモード),” and argues for a rereading of Freud by suffusing classical logic with the topology of the subject.

02.1_Amour_du_tout_3eme_partie

Second argument in the “Trois essais sur la théorie de la vérité” series. This document is the fourth installment of the second argument, entitled “今日のすべての愛 ( 真実を書く主要なモード),” and deliberates between the role of science and of the church, following the assertions made by Lacan in L’Etourdit.

02.1_Amour_du_tout_4eme_partie

Second argument in the “Trois essais sur la théorie de la vérité” series. This document is the final installment of the second argument, 資格のある “今日のすべての愛 ( 真実を書く主要なモード),” and contains the annexes, which demonstrate the parent argument mathematically.

02.1_Amour_du_tout_Elements_formels_(Annexes+Table_des_matieres