Category Archives: Jacques Lacan

Projective plane and Lacanian subject — some examples

The projective plane is a non-orientable surface which is not representable (can be merged) in our usual three-dimensional space. After returning to a few definitions and properties of the projective plane, I will give some examples of the uses that Jacques Lacan of this topological object. These include representations involving the subject of the unconscious. However what is presented is not a formal mathematical work and includes trivialisations which can go against mathematicians. Jacques B.Siboni

Hypertext version Postscript version

Jean-Michel Vappereau — Comments on the Sokal Affair — 1996

Richard Klein’s transcript of Jean-Michel Vappereau’s comments on the “Sokal affair” in 1996. The “Sokal affair” or “Sokal hoax” was an instance of intentional academic fraud conducted by Alan Sokal, a physics professor at New York University and University College London. Sokal submitted a paper laced with jargon that appealed to the ideological sensibilities of the editors of Social Text, a renowned journal in cultural studies. These are Vappereau’s comments on the situation, delivered sometime shortly after the Sokal publication.

JMV_Comments_on_the_Sokal_affair

[Added: 2025/8/23]

Jean-Michel Vappereau — L’amour du tout aujourd’hui (le mode majeur de l’écriture de la vérité) – 1ère partie

Second argument in the “Trois essais sur la théorie de la vérité” series. This document is the first installment of the second argument, entitled “L’amour du tout aujourd’hui ( le mode majeur de l’écriture de la vérité),” and introduces the argument between defining the subject of the unconscious qua Freud and Lacan, and also of discourse, which can be articulated relative to mathematics.

02.1_Amour_du_tout_1ere_partie

[Added: 2025/08/25]

Jean-Michel Vappereau — L’amour du tout aujourd’hui (le mode majeur de l’écriture de la vérité) – 2ème partie I

Second argument in the “Trois essais sur la théorie de la vérité” series. This document is the first part of the second installment of the second argument, entitled “L’amour du tout aujourd’hui ( le mode majeur de l’écriture de la vérité),” and distinguishes between object language and commentary language, called metalanguage.

02.1_Amour_du_tout_2eme_partie_I

[Added 2025/08/25]

Jean-Michel Vappereau — L’amour du tout aujourd’hui (le mode majeur de l’écriture de la vérité) – 2ème partie II

Second argument in the “Trois essais sur la théorie de la vérité” series. This document is part two of the second installment of the second argument, entitled “L’amour du tout aujourd’hui ( le mode majeur de l’écriture de la vérité),” and elaborates the necessities of classical logic as a writing of Freud’s subject.

02.1_Amour_du_tout_2eme_partie_II

[Added 2025/08/25]