Gérard Crovisier shows cutting ups made on a sphere and their implications in clinic.
Also starting at time 1:01:23 we review some questions that emerged as a result of the workshop #33.
All our workshops: c’est ici
Returning to the Lacanian presentation of schema R applied to a cross-cap he considers the real to have a Moebius strip structure. Without changing this paradigm it is possible to build it out of a cylinder. Using this structure it is often easier to explain the relation of the subject with its objects of desire; this as well in the case of “normality”, neurosis, Psychosis.
An article is available at the following address: pdf
All our workshops: c’est ici
The standard logic, called Aristotle logic, uses the principle of the excluded third. I.e a proposition is either true or false. However, by a closer look as did Godel, Husserl, Lacan and many others, we see that some cases invalidate this approach by revealing a part of undecidable. The logic must integrate its share of incompleteness. There are propositions that may be true and false, or neither true nor false. These modified logic elements could remain on purely mathematical fields. The analytical listening uncovers that much of the discourse of the analysand enters into this logic of four truths values. We describe this tetravalent logic in its mathematical approach and clinical approach.
All our workshops: c’est ici
How many syllables in a signifier? How to name a missing signifier? What is the nature of the skin separating signifier and signified? And separating truth and knowledge?
All our workshops: c’est ici
Third of a series of conversations between John Gasperoni and Jacques B. Siboni.
Dr. Jacques Lacan mentioned that psychoanalysis and the English tongue where poorly compatible. With John Gasperoni we develop what this assertion suggest to us, I being from a French speaking country and he being from an English speaking one.
What is the part of the Anglo-saxon culture vs. Romance culture?
What is the part of the differences in the structures of these two languages. Is is one more form of “Folie à deux” between Anglo-saxon world and psychoanalysis?
Corpofreudiano France and Topologos joined for a session of the laboratory of the concept. Its object was the concept and the signifier. Here we present excerpts. Specifically what enters the notion of “disputation” that exists in latin and English among others. But not in french. This term proposed by Henry Fontana is opposed to discussion which in latin denotes the crash of the other. Here we are inaugurating by this term a process of dialectical progress. Thanks for returning your perception of this work.
We have written an amplification of this dialogue in pdf at http://lutetium.org/uploads/topologos/a18062803.pdf
All our workshops: c’est ici
This is a return to the Moebius' strip and the projective plane structures. The clinical relationship between these 2 structures
All our workshops: c’est ici
Second of a series of conversations between John Gasperoni and Jacques B. Siboni. A conversation around the knot of fantasy
An animated discussion during which are evoked different structural conceptions of knots. Topological objects are confronted with the psychoanalytic clinic.
Note difficulties due to the absence of operator for the camera!
All our workshops: c’est ici
First of a series of conversations between John Gasperoni and Jacques B. Siboni. A conversation around the Borromean Knot and the carving of the real by the symbolic and the imaginary